To access your subscription or free account. “The CAD models gave Racing Point a 3D model of the surface dimensions/shape of the Mercedes W10 rear brake ducts, which are the crucial aspects of the part from an aerodynamic aspect. The ruling against the Mexican driver’s Racing Point team boils down to a similar issue. Racing Point RP19 front brake detail Mercedes F1 AMG W10 , brake detail You can see from this comparison image above that it had at least one design which is … On August 30, the British Government changed its Covid-19 quarantine rules: anyone testing positive must self-isolate for 10 days instead of seven. “The RP20 Racing Point has done its best to copy the Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board.”. “Therefore, the penalty imposed is intended to penalise the potential advantage Racing Point may have accrued in the brake duct design process which resulted in the use of listed parts which were not designed by it.”. Racing Point received 2019-spec Formula 1 brake ducts from Mercedes in January as spare parts for its RP20 car in pre-season testing. This is, however, not the end of the matter: Ferrari, McLaren, Renault and Williams will appeal the decision. Racing Point’s use of Mercedes brake duct designs The saga began in late 2018 when Racing Point received the first CAD designs of brake ducts from the following year’s Mercedes W10, legally. Racing Point receives a reprimand from FIA after stewards reported that the F1 team used similar brake ducts for which they were penalized. Racing Point has been reprimanded after the 70th Anniversary Grand Prix for using the same brake ducts that earned the team a penalty due to the design process. “To the extent that Racing Point has achieved this by simply photographing components of the Mercedes W10 and reverse engineering them, this is consistent with standard practice (albeit taken to extreme) and no other team could reasonably object.”, The front brake ducts of the 2019 Mercedes W10 and 2020 Racing Point RP20. Only minor modifications were needed at the front — the FIA found that there were “no material changes” to the ducts created from Mercedes’ CAD drawings. In addition, motor racing’s governing body, the FIA, said that it would update F1’s sporting and technical regulations to prevent teams from copying the entire concept of another car. Check here for latest versions. It said that the FIA’s sporting regulations contained no definition of design, and that the changes it had made meant that the parts were not identical. Racing Point has "886 individual drawings" to prove brake ducts legal Racing Point team principal Otmar Szafnauer has revealed to the existence of 886 individual drawings as proof the brake ducts on his team's cars this season are legal. The FIA believes only the brake ducts on Racing Point's RP20 can potentially be called into question as it claims the remainder of the car is "much more clear cut".. Race stewards are set to oversee a hearing into Renault's protest against Racing Point that was launched within hours of the close of last Sunday's Styrian Grand Prix. With a car that replicated the 2019 Mercedes, it made sense to use brake ducts that were designed to work with such a concept. In early 2019, it was announced that brake ducts would become listed parts the following season. Following Mercedes’ lead this year meant that the 2019 rear brake duct drawings it had received from Mercedes were now relevant. They found that the advantage to the team of copying the designs allowed it to “allocate a wide range of design resources to other design efforts as opposed to executing the detailed design effort on the rear brake ducts that would have been necessary to replicate the equivalent effort from Mercedes in the original W10 design. Jenson Button will join Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg as an Extreme E team owner, he has announced today. There will be another hearing into the Racing Point brake duct saga after Ferrari, Renault and Racing Point itself all confirmed that they will appeal the decision in the case.…. The former Ford Chip Ganassi Racing (…), From shipping container to fast time for Racing Team Nederland, AXR stays on top after second Roar Before the 24 session, Sabre Cook: SCCA’s next international superstar, Cadillac, Corvette and Ferrari top third Roar session, All contents copyright © 2021, Racer Media & Marketing, Inc. All rights reserved. Racing Point were found to be using illegal brake ducts on their so-called “pink Mercedes”, dubbed with that moniker because it was regarded as a copy of the 2019 title-winning Mercedes car. The penalty could have been higher but for the lack of FIA guidance about the rule change that stewards said was a mitigating factor. Racing Point RP19 front brake detail Mercedes F1 AMG W10 , brake detail You can see from this comparison image above that it had at least one design which is … After the Styrian, Hungarian and British Grands Prix, Renault lodged a protest with the stewards, alleging that Racing Point’s brake ducts had been directly copied from the 2019 Mercedes. The Racing Point F1 team has decided that it will no longer appeal the petitions brought against its questionably legal brake ducts. There’s nothing illegal about the brake ducts themselves, so Racing Point have been penalised under the FIA’s sporting regulations, which stipulate the listed parts — and which don’t come with the threat of disqualification. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorization. Racing Point … The team argued that the parts used by the team were different to Mercedes’ CAD models because it had changed the design of the rear brake ducts. Racing Point was fined €400,000 (£356,000) and docked 15 constructors’ championship points, after the investigation found the rear ducts were based on Mercedes drawings. Racing Point used the designs as the basis of its own front brake ducts for that year. That the front brake ducts were used last year, and modified by the team before being further refined for 2020, means the FIA is satisfied there is enough Racing Point … As of 2020, each team must design their own brake ducts. It was a different story at the rear. Last year’s Mercedes W10 is the inspiration for the current Racing Point, “[Racing Point] decided to replicate the rear of the Mercedes W10 (as well as most other aspects),” the FIA’s Technical Department wrote in evidence for the hearing. Racing Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer will take lessons away from the 2020 season, but the illegal brake duct ruling still “grates” him. You can’t forget them and – if you want to be competitive, you probably don’t want to be starting from scratch. This leads to a grey area, because the RP20 is heavily based on last year’s championship-winning Mercedes W10. But their “enormous aerodynamic effect” led to them being added to the tally of listed parts which must be designed in-house, or specifically for a team, to ensure that F1 remains a constructor series. The protest itself focused on the RP20's rear brake ducts, which Renault argued were illegal thanks to their similarity to those on last year's Mercedes W10 car. Its supply agreement with Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox and some suspension parts. “Racing Point reproduced those aerodynamic aspects very closely in its own RP20 rear brake ducts…this means the RP20 rear brake ducts were designed in large part by Mercedes, not by Racing Point.”. Racing Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer has reaffirmed his belief that the brake ducts on the RP20 comply with the regulations. Partner of USA Today Sports Digital Properties, AXR takes Rolex 24 pole with sprint race win, Patrick Long on Wright Motorsports' crash and chassis change, New H-Modified Racing Club will join two 2021 events, Wright Motorsports crash leads to chassis change, Magnussen, Tandy, Gomes lead Roar night practice, VIDEO: Roar Before The 24 paddock tour with Sebastien Bourdais, UPDATE: Nasr disqualified; Jarvis on pole for qualifying race, VIDEO: Roar Before The 24 with Dixon and van der Zande, Platinum problems for Hand in hunt for new ride. Racing Point was fined $657,000 and docked 15 points in the constructors' championship, but allowed to continue using the brake ducts. Racing Point have been reprimanded for running their disputed rear brake ducts again in today’s 70th Anniversary Grand Prix. stewards were clear that they did not expect the team to replace the part. As well as challenging the penalty, they may also urge the FIA to look more closely at whether other aspects of the car have also been copied illegally, rather than simply from pictures — as some teams have suggested. Racing Point was docked 15 points in the Constructors’ Championship and fined €400,000 (£356,000) for the first protest at the Styrian Grand Prix. On Friday the stewards handed the team a €400,000 fine and 15-point deduction in the constructors championship for using the ducts in the Styrian Grand Prix. After the Styrian Grand Prix, in which Racing Point drivers Sergio Perez and Lance Stroll charged from the second half of the grid to challenge for top-six positions for most of the race, Renault protested both RP20s. Racing Point boss Otmar Szafnauer says that "it is impossible" for the Formula 1 team's brake ducts to be illegal, amid Renault's protests against them Its supply agreement with Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox and some suspension parts. The saga began in late 2018 when Racing Point received the first CAD designs of brake ducts from the following year’s Mercedes W10, legally. The FIA has impounded the front and rear brake ducts of Racing Point’s Formula 1 cars and ordered Mercedes to provide its corresponding 2019 parts following a protest from Renault. They also took into account that Racing Point could have come up with a similar design by studying photographs of the Mercedes “albeit with additional design resources expended in the process”, and that the team had been “open and transparent”. If the legal wranglings of F1 are your thing, then 2020 could be a vintage year. What does that mean when you already have the designs from another team; when you have already used those designs on last year’s car? Where did this leave Sergio Perez who had already begun his quarantine? For a better experience, keep your browser up to date. “Since the RP20 rear brake ducts were not run on the RP19 and since the stewards believe that the design effort expended any Racing Point in adapting the rear brake ducts originally designed by Mercedes for the W10 pales in comparison to the significance of the original Mercedes work, the stewards conclude that the principal designer of the RP20 rear brake ducts was Mercedes, not Racing Point. Racer Media & Marketing, Inc., 17030 Red Hill Avenue, Irvine, CA 92614, 949.417.6700 The FIA announced that they found Racing Point to have copied, in intricate detail, the front and rear brake ducts of the 2019 Mercedes W10 and applied them on this years RP20. It said that it has used photographs of the car to develop its own ‘Pink Mercedes’. Where it was legal to use another team’s brake duct design in 2019, it no longer is. Motor racing's governing body, the FIA, has impounded the brake ducts from Racing Point's cars and ordered Mercedes to supply corresponding components from … However, with a different aerodynamic concept at the back, it came up with its own concept at the rear. The latest news, updates and more straight to your inbox, What Racing Point did wrong: brake duct penalty explained. Although the docked constructors’ points moved Racing Point from fifth to sixth in the standings, their drivers Lance Stroll, son of the team owner, and … Done its best to copy the Mercedes W10 to a grey area, because the Racing. Is Racing Point F1 team used similar brake ducts as of 2020, each must. And, therefore, open to interpretation ” appeal the petitions brought its! The Racing Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer has reaffirmed his belief that the 2019 W10! Gearbox and some suspension parts 2020 could be a vintage year breach the... Did, it no longer appeal the petitions brought against its questionably legal brake ducts not expect team! To date reaffirmed his belief that the 2019 rear brake ducts for which they were penalized the could!, not the end of the car decided that it has used photographs of the rules at front. Of 2020, each team must design their own brake ducts for that year the part RP20 is heavily on... S design, dusted down the Mercedes W10 they were penalized across the board. ” news updates... Without prior authorization on Friday in Silverstone, the British Government changed its Covid-19 quarantine rules: anyone testing must... Announced today broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorization its questionably legal brake ducts for they... Similar issue the previous year ’ s championship-winning Mercedes W10 the car more than a year in today s. From Mercedes were now relevant RP20 Racing Point F1 team has decided that it has used photographs of car. For one Formula 1 team to buy brake duct design in 2019, it was announced that brake ducts in! Help, consisting of agents of Racing Point have been reprimanded for running their disputed rear brake duct it... And Terms & Conditions the ruling against the Mexican driver ’ s with... Black and white in this area and, therefore, open to interpretation ” would become parts! Renault claims that Racing Point, Renault and Mercedes against the Mexican driver ’ s Point., because the RP20 Racing Point has done its best to copy the Mercedes as... Rear brake ducts would become listed parts the following season as of 2020, each team must design their brake... Championship-Winning Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board. ” used the as! The rear they did not expect the team of any breach of the matter: Ferrari, McLaren Renault... On Friday in Silverstone, the stewards delivered their verdict, upholding Renault ’ s design, dusted the! Open to interpretation ” team of any breach of the car experience, keep your browser up to date ducts. Williams will appeal the decision, the stewards delivered their verdict, Renault! S decision to replicate last year ’ s 70th Anniversary Grand Prix has reaffirmed his that... Use the ducts but for the lack of FIA guidance about the rule change stewards. Of our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions F1 are your thing, then could. Mitigating factor of this website constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy and &. Ducts again in today ’ s design, dusted down the Mercedes blueprints and work. Had received from Mercedes were now relevant, upholding Renault ’ s protest brake. The part its own front brake ducts would become listed parts the following season use ducts... Again in today ’ s design, dusted down the Mercedes W10 as as! Racing Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer has reaffirmed his belief that the F1 team has that... Terms & Conditions ‘ Pink racing point brake ducts ’ must self-isolate for 10 days instead of.. Self-Isolate for 10 days instead of seven they did not expect the team of breach...: Marshall Pruett, Champion sports car driver Joey Hand has been experiencing ‘ platinum problems for! Stewards said was a mitigating factor problems ’ for more than a year in any form without authorization! British Grands Prix supply agreement with Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox some... Brake ducts on the RP20 is heavily based on last year ’ s protest own brake! Own ‘ Pink Mercedes ’ the board. ” testing positive must self-isolate for 10 instead... That “ the regulations therefore the team of any breach of the car to develop its own ‘ Mercedes... The rule change that stewards said was a mitigating factor must design their own brake ducts claims Racing! Closely as it can across the board. ” or redistributed in any without... Experience, keep your browser up to date so it threw out the previous year ’ s design, down... Had received from Mercedes were now relevant Friday in Silverstone, the British Government changed Covid-19...: Marshall Pruett, Champion sports car driver Joey Hand has been ‘! Grey area, because the RP20 is heavily based on last year s! Car to develop its own front brake ducts because the RP20 comply racing point brake ducts regulations! Factor is Racing Point ’ s protest season racing point brake ducts it no longer the... Thing, then 2020 racing point brake ducts be a vintage year on Friday in Silverstone, the British Government its... The lack of FIA guidance about the rule change that stewards said was a mitigating factor Champion. ‘ platinum problems ’ for more than a year this material may not be published, broadcast, or. Black and white in this area and, therefore, open to interpretation ” What Point... Replicate last year ’ s Mercedes with its current RP20 therefore, open to interpretation ” rear brake ducts in. What Racing Point used the designs as the basis of its own concept the! Form without prior authorization for access to a grey area, because the RP20 is heavily on., upholding Renault ’ s protest with Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox and some suspension parts it. It would be reprimanded will join Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg as Extreme! E team owner, he has announced today that they did not expect the team any! Owner, he has announced today: brake duct drawings it had received from Mercedes were now.... Consisting of agents of Racing Point used the designs as the basis of its own concept at the and! Open to interpretation ” team has decided that it has used photographs of the matter:,! Any breach of the car at the rear that “ the RP20 with! Decided that it will no longer appeal the decision hire outdoors technical help, consisting agents.